Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
3
Votes
Danny L.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
3
Votes |
8
Posts

Analyzing Syndication Deal - Return on Capital?

Danny L.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
Posted
Hello all,

I'm currently looking at a potential MF syndication deal. I started investing in syndication this year and have been learning through books, online, and various podcasts. One of the things I came across was determining if the deal was based on Return on Capital or Return of Capital.

Looking at the PPM for this deal, I couldn't figure out which method they were using. I searched the document for either phrase and came up with nothing.

The closest section I've found is this:

(i) Net Distributable Cash shall be distributed quarterly on the following basis:
a. First, to Class A Members, a 9% Preferred Return,
b. Second, pari passu to Class B Members, a 7% Preferred Return, to Class C Members, an 8% Preferred
Return, to Class D Members, a 9% Preferred Return, and to Class E Members, a 10% Preferred Return,
in each case in proportion to each Member’s respective Preferred Return Balances until each such
Member’s Preferred Return Balance is reduced to zero;

My guess is "until each such Member’s Preferred Return Balance is reduced to zero" would indicate distributions are based on Return of Capital.

I'll appreciate if someone with experience on this topic can confirm if my interpretation is correct.

Thank you.


Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,284
Posts
6,908
Votes
Brian Burke
#1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Santa Rosa, CA
6,908
Votes |
2,284
Posts
Brian Burke
#1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Santa Rosa, CA
Replied

@Danny L., glad you are enjoying the book!

This appears to be a case where distributions are return ON capital first. It isn’t the best drafting, but one clue is where it says “Distributions of the Preferred Return do not reduce a Member’s Capital Account.”  That isn’t true, distributions always reduce a member’s capital account, but I think what they meant to say here is that distributions don’t reduce a member’s capital balance.

Another clue is that the preferred return is calculated using annualized return, not IRR. In the case of an IRR hurdle, all capital must be returned in order to hit it. That doesn't change much from a practical perspective until the percentage is exceeded—it just delays going to the next tier until capital is returned, that's all.

Another clue is that if preferred return is based on an annualized return, the waterfall language would have to say something like, "first, to the Class B Member to the extent of their unreturned capital," if the first distributions were to be return OF capital. This one doesn't say that—it says first to preferred return, and we now know the preferred return is not IRR.

You might also want to look up the definition of “Capital Return” because it’s mentioned in the definition of Preferred Return, just to see if that alters anything.

Loading replies...