Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Central Valley, CA
3,729
Votes |
6,037
Posts

Reverse Mortgage Short Sales

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Central Valley, CA
Posted

I'd like to hear from anyone who has successfully worked a short sale with a HUD insured reverse mortgage. Not all reverse mortgages are HUD insured, but in my farms easily 90% of RMs made during the Bubble were HUD insured.

The terms of the HUD insured deed-of-trust require that the loan is due and payable when the last borrower has died and/or is no longer living the property. The repayment terms are the lesser of 1) the amount due or 2) 95% of fair market value.

I'd like to hear from any agent or investor (or heir) who has shorted the lender in a typical short sale or worked with heirs in order to document FMV and then sell for 95%.

Most of the outstanding balances I'm seeing are in excess of typical Bubble refinancing balances. It's not unusual in my areas to see a $250K refinance in 2007 for a property now worth $100K. But the RM balances are much higher, more like a $350K line of credit for a similar property. It appears that the lines of credit were based on FMV at the time, plus projected appreciation and interest, based on how old you were when you took the loan.

Purchasing at 95% of current documented FMV may work for my purposes. But I'm seeing a lot of properties not held in a trust, which means heirs would have to pay to open a probate just to transfer title to a property with no equity. I've been contacted by a few and I'm just starting to strategize about what can be done.

Experiences? Suggestions? :)

Loading replies...