Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Sush Girish
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Foreclosure Auctions Opening Bid

Sush Girish
Posted

Hello, I am newbie in foreclosure auction space any help here is appreciated. I was doing some duedelligence and following a property on auction.com, recently opening bid is changed.

Initially Opening bid was set closer to what is owed by the owner of the property to the lender, What is owed by the owner could be verified by other foreclosure property websites. Foreclosure agent changed the opening bid really high closer to fair market value. What could be rational behind increasing the opening bid. What if no one bids and property goes to the lender? Is there a concept of excess proceedings when lender opens the bid higher than what is owed and the property goes back to the lender. 

Loading replies...