Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Rosalyn Dones
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Bernardino, CA
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Representing Real Estate Investors in CA

Rosalyn Dones
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Bernardino, CA
Posted

Does the state of CA require that I have a real estate broker's license to represent a group of real estate investors looking to purchase multiple REO properties?

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • CA
182
Votes |
762
Posts
Account Closed
  • CA
Replied
Originally posted by Mitch Kronowit:
Originally posted by Steve L.:
Only if you are expecting the Seller to pay you a commission.

Really?!?!? So if some investor(s) wants me to find them a property to invest in, I can be their agent, without a license, so long as I don't ask the seller for a commission (obviously I would charge the buyer a fee for services)???

Interesting to know. Thanks. :cool:

The California Business and Professions code defines a broker like this:
Broker Defined
10131. A real estate broker within the meaning of this part is a person who, for a compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, does or negotiates to do one or more of the following acts for another or others:
(a) Sells or offers to sell, buys or offers to buy, solicits prospective sellers or purchasers of, solicits or obtains listings of, or negotiates the purchase, sale or exchange of real property or a business opportunity....

So, if there is no compensation and no expectation of compensation, you are not a broker, by definition.

Loading replies...