Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
2
Votes
David Mcginnis
  • Investor
  • Bellevue, WA
2
Votes |
10
Posts

Security deposits on a foreclosure auction purchase

David Mcginnis
  • Investor
  • Bellevue, WA
Posted

Recently looked at an occupied 3 unit building that was scheduled for foreclosure. Presumably, the tenants has posted security deposits for their units. And presumably, if I had purchased at auction, I would then own the building but I would very likely not have the security deposits.  If a tenant subsequently moved out they would want their security deposit back. Technically, I would not be a party to the lease that they had signed, but I beleive in Washington an auction buyer has to respect at least some aspects of the existing lease.  In my non-legal view, my responsibility would be to respect the lease rate and their occupancy rights (things that I have some power to control) but the former landlord still holds the deposit and the tenant could seek recourse against that person, who has a direct legal responsibility to refund (if the tenant satisfied the refund criteria).   Seems like I don't  benefit from a security deposit and should not be responsible for refunding. Also, if I sign new leases with existing tenants, I will have a difficult time convincing them to post a new security deposit. Curious if anyone has any practical experience about how that might get sorted out. 

Loading replies...