Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
HUA YANG
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Is it normal that seller stays in the house after the short sale deal is closed?

HUA YANG
Posted

We were waiting to buy a short sale. The bank finally approved the price but requires 30 days to close the deal before going to foreclosure, which will be before the Christmas. However, the list agent states that the seller does not move out of the house until three months later by next March. Our agent indicated that we may be able to give the seller some credit like three months rental, $6k -$10k, to persuade him. My questions is:
Is it normal that the seller to stay in the house for a few months after the escort is finished? Our concern is we may be facing the problem to pay the mortgage for someone else to live in the house. I guess the bank and all realtors will walk away after the deal is closed. I am afraid it would become a problem between the seller and us. Then we have to go to court. I do not want to see that happens.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,127
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,127
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

Not only is it not normal, but its almost certainly a violation of the terms specified by the lender. The lender will state the seller can receive no benefit, and staying in the house three months is certainly a benefit. Look at the paperwork on the deal, and I think you'll find a statement to this effect. If not, ask for copies of any additional paperwork from the bank you'll be required to sign at closing and it will be in there somewhere. Better to find out now than to get to closing, be asked to sign this statement and to be unable to close.

My first advice would be to walk away if you can't have possession of the house on the day of closing.

If this is your dream house and you're determined to buy it and willing to put up with this BS, then the first step is to be absolutely certain the lender who's approving the short sale is fully aware the seller is staying. Add a statement to this effect into the contract, and push it back through the approval process. I believe this will actually kill your deal, but I suppose the bank could approve it.

If the bank does sign it, and you're willing to put up with this, make it a rental. Come up with a solid lease. Best to get one from someone in your area. You agent may be able to help. Set the rent and deposit high. The seller is wanting the benefit of not moving. You want to move in. Make them pay. At least make it somewhat higher than market rent. I'd be sure its well over enough to cover the payment on the new place as well as any expenses. I'd actually make it significantly higher than that. Require the deposit and first months rent (or, the full three months) at closing. Since I assume you're bringing some money to closing, it would reduce the amount you bring rather than giving you cash in hand.

Your lender is going to require that you qualify for both loans, if you're going to have to keep your existing place for a while. Is that a problem?

I'd plan to have to do an eviction. If they can't be out now, what's going to change in three months? Having a formalized lease gives you the basis for doing an eviction in three months when they refuse to leave. If you choose, you could let them go month-to-month and continue to collect rent, if they're willing to pay. My guess is that they won't pay and won't leave, and you have to do an eviction. That's a month long process that costs a few hundred in some places. If you've in a tenant friendly area, it can be many months and cost much more.

Seriously consider just blowing off this deal and finding another house.

Loading replies...