Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,338
Posts
684
Votes
Steve L.
  • Investor
  • Rancho Cucamonga, CA
684
Votes |
1,338
Posts

2nd won't allow Seller to get relocation funds that 1st approved

Steve L.
  • Investor
  • Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posted

I have a California short-sale approved.  

The Sellers owes $550k on the 1st.  $150k on the 2nd.

The first approved an offer around market value (around $300,000) and $5,000 in relocation funds and $4,000 to the 2nd.

The second says they will approve the amount but they will not allow $5,000 in relocation funds and wants the 1st lender to remove that option.

Does anyone have any experience with this or suggestions?  The Seller needs the relocation funds.  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,341
Posts
588
Votes
Minna Reid
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Jacksonville FL & Middletown CT
588
Votes |
1,341
Posts
Minna Reid
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Jacksonville FL & Middletown CT
Replied

Have you tried quoting/making a case for 1st lienholder investor guidelines? Usually if you push these enough the second may reconsider - (ie...It's not our choice! We didn't choose this! Its the first lienholder!! They have to follow their investor guidelines!!! They wont relent!! It's their policy! We really tried...)  if you can produce their guidelines in writing that may help...

If that doesn't work - maybe get a little more to the second? Try allocating the funds differently.

Loading replies...