Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

219
Posts
83
Votes
Brian Wall
  • Wholesaler
  • Santa Fe Springs, CA
83
Votes |
219
Posts

Short Sale Negotiators must be licensed?

Brian Wall
  • Wholesaler
  • Santa Fe Springs, CA
Posted

I just got finished reading this article here, and the Assitant Deputy of the DRE basically says, among other things, that the person or entity that negotiates with a lender on behalf of a seller must be a licensed entity.

http://www.loansafe.org/short-sale-fraud

Can someone clear this up for me? I am looking at doing my first s/s flip, and was planning on hiring a Florida based company (someone we all know here on the boards), to negotiate with the lenders, how can I protect myself, and the listing agent?

BTW, the article talks about other issues with fraud around short sales, all of which could be diffused with proper documentation, so I am not worried about the other things, just the licensing of the negotiator piece.

PS - Just found the actual DRE document where the article came from http://www.dre.ca.gov/pdf_docs/Article_ShortSales03_2010.pdf

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,018
Posts
802
Votes
Scott Hubbard
  • Rehabber
  • Tucson, AZ
802
Votes |
1,018
Posts
Scott Hubbard
  • Rehabber
  • Tucson, AZ
Replied

I believe, as it was told to me by a CA attorney, this law applies to a third-party person or entity charging a fee.

If your a principal in the transaction, then you can negotiate without being in violation of the law as long they are not being compensated through a fee. Principal's in transactions are paid through proceeds of the sale (profit) as opposed to a fee. Taken from the link you provided - Additionally, if a person is acting solely on behalf of himself or herself, or itself in the case of an entity, there is no need for a real estate license since the person or entity is not acting on behalf of another or others.


My company, too, will no longer negotiate in California as a third party.

Loading replies...