Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

858
Posts
305
Votes
Maryann L.
  • Specialist
  • Massachusetts
305
Votes |
858
Posts

Discussion on commission

Maryann L.
  • Specialist
  • Massachusetts
Posted

I just read through a bunch of posts for short sales and commissions. It looks as if everyone does it different. I'd like to hear from seasoned investors doing short sales how they compensate the Realtors. We have a commission structure that 1/2 of the Realtors we've talked to seem to think is great and 1/2 think they are loosing out.

Right now we pay a total of 6% on the highest sale (less lender paid commission). So for instance...
AB
We purchase for 150,000 and bank pays 4% = $6,000
BC
We resell for $180,000 and pay 6% = $10,800 (less lender paid commissions) = we owe $4800 (10,800-6000)

The agents we've been working with all along think it's great because they wouldn't have had a second sale without us, plus we're doing all the work. So if we hadn't come along they'd be getting the 4% on 150,000 or whatever they sold the property for IF they sold it.
(oh this is if they handle all transactions) They decide what to co-broke.

So we've been trying to branch out which means we've run into a few new Realtors. When we present our listing agreement disclosures, I've had 2 agents complain about the structure....so I'd like to see how everyone else is handling it so that I can tweak our commission structure if necessary.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,018
Posts
801
Votes
Scott Hubbard
  • Rehabber
  • Tucson, AZ
801
Votes |
1,018
Posts
Scott Hubbard
  • Rehabber
  • Tucson, AZ
Replied

Some states are considered transactional meaning they can represent both the seller and buyer in a transaction. In others, the agent/broker must pick a side.
I have talked to attorneys in Arizona, California, and Colorado and all have said there is potential liabilities to the broker/agent.

You are in effect, hiring an agent/broker to use their expertise to create value by representing the same property at two different values. This is called collusion.

It is a much different situation if you use an agent to purchase the property in the A to B fix it up (add value), then use the same agent to sell B to C.

If your using an agent to do a straight retail flip, then your really adding no value. For us, as investors, we can do this because we disclose. However, for the agent/broker, it could cause problems with their DRE.

Personally, I get agents who bring me deals and I inform them what I have been told by my attorneys. I have paid both sides, but I get them to sign a waiver that they are responsible for their actions and the consequences.

Loading replies...