Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

28
Posts
5
Votes
Chris Dengel
  • Investor
  • Taylorsville, KY
5
Votes |
28
Posts

Is it risky to be added as an authorized user on a delinquent act

Chris Dengel
  • Investor
  • Taylorsville, KY
Posted

I'm trying  to acquire a property after  I saw the owners moving, and they said they're letting the bank have it back. I call the bank's loss mitigation department and they said to get any info or begin the negotiations, I need to be added as an authorized user. I am concerned about being black listed from purchasing it in the future or being tied to/obligated to the mortgage of a delinquent account.  Can some one shed some light on this process? Or has anyone successfully purchased a property this way?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,293
Posts
500
Votes
Brett Goldsmith
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
500
Votes |
1,293
Posts
Brett Goldsmith
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Yes, getting authorized on a sellers account and then trying to purchase it via a short sale could be a red flag. I would agree that a buyer shouldn't be authorized on the sellers side of the transaction to speak with the bank. I've seen buyers blacklisted for writing up offers prior to a property hitting the market and meeting the investors criteria of marketing. Anything that could make the bank feel that the transaction isn't arms length should be avoided; It'd be a shame to have an arms length transaction be construed as non arms length.

Loading replies...