Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

28
Posts
5
Votes
Chris Dengel
  • Investor
  • Taylorsville, KY
5
Votes |
28
Posts

Is it risky to be added as an authorized user on a delinquent act

Chris Dengel
  • Investor
  • Taylorsville, KY
Posted

I'm trying  to acquire a property after  I saw the owners moving, and they said they're letting the bank have it back. I call the bank's loss mitigation department and they said to get any info or begin the negotiations, I need to be added as an authorized user. I am concerned about being black listed from purchasing it in the future or being tied to/obligated to the mortgage of a delinquent account.  Can some one shed some light on this process? Or has anyone successfully purchased a property this way?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,293
Posts
500
Votes
Brett Goldsmith
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
500
Votes |
1,293
Posts
Brett Goldsmith
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Yes, getting authorized on a sellers account and then trying to purchase it via a short sale could be a red flag. I would agree that a buyer shouldn't be authorized on the sellers side of the transaction to speak with the bank. I've seen buyers blacklisted for writing up offers prior to a property hitting the market and meeting the investors criteria of marketing. Anything that could make the bank feel that the transaction isn't arms length should be avoided; It'd be a shame to have an arms length transaction be construed as non arms length.

Loading replies...