Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 16 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Lara Ghelerter
0
Votes |
1
Posts

1st time homebuyer and REO's

Lara Ghelerter
Posted

We had just been bidding on a REO and we had supposedly come to an agreement. We had signed an original purchase agreement, but the bank hadn't signed off yet. Then we received a 5 page addendum that nullified most of our contingencies. When we refused to sign our realtor told us that the bank's addendum was common and we shouldn't try and buy an REO because the addendum was standard and every bank would insist upon the same addendum. Is this true? Is it standard for a bank to limit your contingencies to where you don't really have enough time to do an inspection and title search. And to insist upon signing away the contingencies after you've come to what you thought was a fair deal?

Loading replies...