Foreclosures
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 19 years ago,
Redemption intrusion
When I was going through forclosure{assessment lien}redemption, an
outside investor(not a junior creditor}had a lender place a mortgage
against my property. I already had a mortgage on it. This investor had absolutely no claim or ownership on my property at the time. The mortgage (his)even had a future advance clause on it. I found this out months later during a quiet title search. My question is is this in anyway
legal, despite I eventually lost my home later on?
I did discover a Satisfaction of Mortgage letter in the search related to this mortgage. As some have asked, "What harm did it do to you?" Or,
"What difference did it make?" I reply to that like this...
This outside investor actually approached my 2nd mortgage lien holder
asking to be a junior lien holder. How strange is that? From what other documentation I found is that the 2nd mortgage holder actually granted
him creditor status after his mortgage was approved. Stranger yet?
I have now found that my 1st mortgage was clouded over during the foreclosure process and into the redemption period without my knowledge or the primary lenders. The 1st mortgage was eventually paid off under my account # after the 7-day redemp period. Yes, I received my satisfaction of mortgage letter, as well as convincing the IRS that I didn't payoff my mortgage. Oh, I used to live in a townhome association-
now doesn't that make more sense or what?
Yes , I've beeen through 2 lawyers already and am just trying to find a court to listen to my case as more evidence keeps building that this whole foreclosure was fraudulently done. Any thoughts are helpful. Thanks.
:oops: