Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

45
Posts
6
Votes
Jason Conroy
  • Property Manager
  • Redondo Beach, CA
6
Votes |
45
Posts

(CA) Does purchaser of an REO property owe the existing tenant the security deposit?

Jason Conroy
  • Property Manager
  • Redondo Beach, CA
Posted

I know on a regular purchase, the new owner assumes the responsibility for the security deposit but I heard on an REO that the purchaser has no obligation to pay the tenant back. This seems unfair to the tenant so I wanted to double check here. Let's assume that no mention of security deposits was made on the escrow statement but the tenant's original lease did show one. The property is in California if that makes a difference. Thanks.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,116
Posts
5,171
Votes
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
5,171
Votes |
5,116
Posts
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
Replied

Actually, both the old owner AND the new owner can be held jointly liable for the tenant's security deposit. 

Here's some excerpts from various sources on the subject:

"The lender, bank, or person who now owns your building must return the security deposit to the tenant. The new owner is responsible for any deposit that you paid the old owner. The transferring of the deposit is their responsibility. After the tenant moves, the deposit should be returned in three weeks. If not, the tenant may sue the former owner, the new owner, or both in Small Claims Court."

Source: Santa Cruz County District Attorney's Office: Tenants Rights in Foreclosed Properties

"Under California Civil Code Section 1950.5, a successor owner is jointly liable with the former owner to retun the deposits once the tenant vacates."

Source: Security Deposits after Foreclosure (California)

"Your security deposit, or the amount of money you paid the landlord to protect against damage to the rental unit, must be transferred to the new owner if you are staying or paid to you if you are moving. The new owner has three weeks after you move out to return the deposit amount to you, even if the foreclosed landlord has not given the deposit to the new owner, as per 1950.5 of California Civil Code. The new owner becomes the successor in interest to the former landlord and automatically assumes legal responsibility for your deposit under California law."

Source: California Foreclosure Laws for Tenants

"If the tenant decides to move out of the property after the foreclosure is complete, according to California law, both the former property owner (or the agent who may be holding the security) and the new owner are jointly and severally liable to return of the security deposit to the tenant (less allowable deductions)."

Source: California Apartment Association: Foreclosures and Rental Housing

Loading replies...