Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

35
Posts
9
Votes
James Scholz
  • Investor
  • Auckland, Auckland
9
Votes |
35
Posts

Earthquake damage + uninsurable = profit?

James Scholz
  • Investor
  • Auckland, Auckland
Posted

Not sure if this is the right forum - these aren't exactly foreclosure properties, but are basically handled the same way, just by private sellers.

The back story: A few years ago there was a massive earthquake (or two) in Christchurch, New Zealand and thousands of homes were damaged. Insurers are only now starting to pay out, and a lot of homeowners weren't insured for enough to repair/rebuild their houses. So are walking away.

There are a lot of homes selling 'As is, where is', basically for slightly more than the cost of the land itself, and come with various issues from minor cosmetic issues to major structural ones.

The reason these caught my eye is because they're selling for 40-50 cents on the dollar compared to 'sound' properties in the area, but are being tenanted at the same rate. So the cashflow on them is really good. And the city is rebuilding, and demand is quite high for rentals, and probably will be for a good few years yet.

The issues are: You cant get insurance on the house itself, and the bank want any lending secured on another property.

So my question is: What are everyones thoughts on these sorts of places? Its a fairly high risk purchase, but as it goes - high risk, high return.

Thanks for your help!

Loading replies...