Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get Full Access
Succeed in real estate investing with proven toolkits that have helped thousands of aspiring and existing investors achieve financial freedom.
$0 TODAY
$32.50/month, billed annually after your 7-day trial.
Cancel anytime
Find the right properties and ace your analysis
Market Finder with key investor metrics for all US markets, plus a list of recommended markets.
Deal Finder with investor-focused filters and notifications for new properties
Unlimited access to 9+ rental analysis calculators and rent estimator tools
Off-market deal finding software from Invelo ($638 value)
Supercharge your network
Pro profile badge
Pro exclusive community forums and threads
Build your landlord command center
All-in-one property management software from RentRedi ($240 value)
Portfolio monitoring and accounting from Stessa
Lawyer-approved lease agreement packages for all 50-states ($4,950 value) *annual subscribers only
Shortcut the learning curve
Live Q&A sessions with experts
Webinar replay archive
50% off investing courses ($290 value)
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Foreclosures

User Stats

35
Posts
9
Votes
James Scholz
  • Investor
  • Auckland, Auckland
9
Votes |
35
Posts

Earthquake damage + uninsurable = profit?

James Scholz
  • Investor
  • Auckland, Auckland
Posted Feb 7 2015, 14:51

Not sure if this is the right forum - these aren't exactly foreclosure properties, but are basically handled the same way, just by private sellers.

The back story: A few years ago there was a massive earthquake (or two) in Christchurch, New Zealand and thousands of homes were damaged. Insurers are only now starting to pay out, and a lot of homeowners weren't insured for enough to repair/rebuild their houses. So are walking away.

There are a lot of homes selling 'As is, where is', basically for slightly more than the cost of the land itself, and come with various issues from minor cosmetic issues to major structural ones.

The reason these caught my eye is because they're selling for 40-50 cents on the dollar compared to 'sound' properties in the area, but are being tenanted at the same rate. So the cashflow on them is really good. And the city is rebuilding, and demand is quite high for rentals, and probably will be for a good few years yet.

The issues are: You cant get insurance on the house itself, and the bank want any lending secured on another property.

So my question is: What are everyones thoughts on these sorts of places? Its a fairly high risk purchase, but as it goes - high risk, high return.

Thanks for your help!

Loading replies...