Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

18
Posts
3
Votes
Jairo Freyre
  • Residential Mortgage Specialist
  • Dallas, TX
3
Votes |
18
Posts

Short sale negotiations

Jairo Freyre
  • Residential Mortgage Specialist
  • Dallas, TX
Posted

Hello,

I have been studying up on negotiating short sales and already have a client that will allow me to negotiate the structure on the property. My question is, is there a conflict of interest with me negotiating the short sale and also purchasing the property? If so, would it be better to set up a different company that handles the purchase and consequent sale of the property or, should I just have a realtor list it while I collect a negotiation fee? Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you.

FYI this deal is in Texas if that makes a difference. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

199
Posts
155
Votes
Kim Knox
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Jacksonville, OR
155
Votes |
199
Posts
Kim Knox
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Jacksonville, OR
Replied

Yes, a conflict exists.  You will be asked to sign an "arm's length transaction" document by the short selling bank, which indicates that you are not collecting any money that is not disclosed in the contract.  You are much better locating a listing agent for the property BUT, a listing agent (and Seller) will be required to have the property active on the market for a certain period of time.  Meaning, you might not be the person who gets into contract with the Seller.

Further, in Oregon, a real estate agent can't pay anyone a negotiating fee except an Attorney or a fellow Realtor.  PLUS, if a Realtor hires you as the negotiator, it could be argued that they are not representing their client by recommending a non-experienced party be the party to negotiate with the bank.  Short sales are much more complicated than you are expecting.

Not only do you have to sign the arm's length affidavit, but so does the Seller and the Real Estate Agent(s).  All parties would be subject to fraud charges if you are the purchaser and collecting money on the transaction.  The Listing Agent and Seller would be subject to fraud if they didn't have the property on the open market.

Further, even if you were a licensed Realtor, representing yourself, you would (often) be ineligible for collecting a commission for representing yourself.  Banks don't consider that discrimination because we (Realtors) are not a protected class.  Many Realtor's who are purchasers do not represent themselves in short sales for this reason.    

Any company that is involved with a purchase is required to provide articles of org as proof of the signing parties and company structure. Meaning, starting another company will not stop your relationship to the transaction from being known.      

Loading replies...