Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

1,111
Posts
1,109
Votes
Nick B.
  • Investor
  • North Richland Hills, TX
1,109
Votes |
1,111
Posts

Foreclosure from a second position

Nick B.
  • Investor
  • North Richland Hills, TX
Posted

Hello All!

I read an article by Dave Van Horn about a second position foreclosure:

http://www.pprnoteco.com/ezine-116-4-26-14/

In there he says that it may make sense to do so but does not elaborate on the outcomes. I asked him to comment on the article but he did not respond hence I am asking here.

What happens if:

  • a property FMV is $200K
  • 1st lien has UPB of $210K and is current
  • 2nd lien has UPB of $20K and is more than 90 days late
  • 2nd lien-holder files for a foreclosure
  • now what?

I understand that the second lien-holder may start foreclosure process but what does he gain from it? If the property is sold for $200K shouldn't the first mortgage be satisfied first thus wiping second one off?

Thanks
Nick

Loading replies...