Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago, 08/23/2023

User Stats

29
Posts
17
Votes
Philip M.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Garland
17
Votes |
29
Posts

Right of redemption after tax foreclosure

Philip M.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Garland
Posted

I have experience with purchasing property before at the tax sale but it has been a few years. I recently purchased one. I am being told that when I decide to refinance (BRRRR) that I can't get clear title for two years. Right of redemption in Texas is 24 months for homestead and 180 days for non-homestead. Previous owner moved out about eight years ago. All the court documents for the foreclosure were sent to them at an address other than this property. In the past I have been able to refinance after 180 days. The title insurance company (who I have used before) is saying 2 years. I suspect that someone challenged the 180 days, won the case and now they are now dictating 2 years are required. I am being told that nothing has changed, but it has. Has anyone else had a similar experience?

Loading replies...