Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
2
Votes
Jacob Cytrynbaum
  • Providence
2
Votes |
22
Posts

Fair Equity/Profit Splitting in Syndications

Jacob Cytrynbaum
  • Providence
Posted

Hello! Hoping to get a little clarity on this issue. Obviously have not done this before and want to be really clear on deal structure before I start so I don't unintentionally screw investors or myself. 

Suppose I syndicate a deal with the following terms: The GPS gets 20% equity+capital they contribute. Investors get 8% annual preferred CoC, then 70/30 profit split up to 12% CoC to investors, then 50/50 thereafter. I expect the building to be cashflow positive each year (not a new development or big value-add project that would take a year or two to cashflow and returns only show up when the building sells).

1. What happens when I sell the building--do I count the money investors have already been paid when considering how to split profits on the sale? Obviously I ensure they get their capital back first and foremost. 

2. What is the point of taking that 20% equity if I have already predefined the profit-split? Is the point that I am double dipping, i.e. that the GP participates as an LP with 20% equity then also gets the bonus waterfall splits? Or do I have that wrong?

Really appreciate any input you all have

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,756
Posts
4,410
Votes
Greg Dickerson#2 Land & New Construction Contributor
  • Developer
  • Charlottesville, VA
4,410
Votes |
4,756
Posts
Greg Dickerson#2 Land & New Construction Contributor
  • Developer
  • Charlottesville, VA
Replied
Originally posted by @Jacob Cytrynbaum:

Hello! Hoping to get a little clarity on this issue. Obviously have not done this before and want to be really clear on deal structure before I start so I don't unintentionally screw investors or myself. 

Suppose I syndicate a deal with the following terms: The GPS gets 20% equity+capital they contribute. Investors get 8% annual preferred CoC, then 70/30 profit split up to 12% CoC to investors, then 50/50 thereafter. I expect the building to be cashflow positive each year (not a new development or big value-add project that would take a year or two to cashflow and returns only show up when the building sells).

1. What happens when I sell the building--do I count the money investors have already been paid when considering how to split profits on the sale? Obviously I ensure they get their capital back first and foremost. 

2. What is the point of taking that 20% equity if I have already predefined the profit-split? Is the point that I am double dipping, i.e. that the GP participates as an LP with 20% equity then also gets the bonus waterfall splits? Or do I have that wrong?

Really appreciate any input you all have

The GP would not receive any equity unless they invest in the deal themselves. Upon sale the preferred return is paid first, initial capital from investors is returned second then remaining profits are split accordingly.

Loading replies...