Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
14
Votes |
13
Posts

To what extent should natural disasters factor into decisions?

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I'm a commercial real estate investor in California and am interested in hearing about how and if other investors factor earthquakes into their investment decisions. For example, if there's a 50% chance of a magnitude 8 earthquake within the next 30 years, would that factor into your underwriting/valuation at all?  Would you consider it at all when deciding whether to sell vs. refinance-and-hold a property? (Assuming you're experienced enough and comfortable investing outside of California) 

Earthquake insurance is very cost-prohibitive and deductibles are usually 25%, so let's disregard property insurance. It doesn't seem like any brokers or investors in California are considering earthquakes. On one hand, you don't want to let something that may never happen get in the way of your financial growth, but one natural disaster can ruin your portfolio especially if you only own a few properties.  Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,218
Posts
2,182
Votes
Ronald Rohde
#2 Syndications & Passive Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Dallas, TX
2,182
Votes |
5,218
Posts
Ronald Rohde
#2 Syndications & Passive Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Dallas, TX
Replied
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I'm a commercial real estate investor in California and am interested in hearing about how and if other investors factor earthquakes into their investment decisions. For example, if there's a 50% chance of a magnitude 8 earthquake within the next 30 years, would that factor into your underwriting/valuation at all?  Would you consider it at all when deciding whether to sell vs. refinance-and-hold a property? (Assuming you're experienced enough and comfortable investing outside of California) 

Earthquake insurance is very cost-prohibitive and deductibles are usually 25%, so let's disregard property insurance. It doesn't seem like any brokers or investors in California are considering earthquakes. On one hand, you don't want to let something that may never happen get in the way of your financial growth, but one natural disaster can ruin your portfolio especially if you only own a few properties.  Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

The investors I know that are concerned about losing it all to an earthquake and won't carry insurance don't invest there. Plenty of lower risk locations with insurance to provide a complete hedge against total loss. Another way would be to put earthquake rebuild funds into an escrow account, whatever you're willing to pay as a premium could be used toward re-building.

  • Ronald Rohde
  • Loading replies...