Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
56
Votes |
73
Posts

Item missing from due diligence materials

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

If an item which was requested during the due diligence period is missing from the due diligence materials and isn't provided until the due diligence period is finished, does that automatically extend the due diligence period through the date of receipt of said item? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,191
Posts
2,161
Votes
Ronald Rohde
#3 Commercial Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Dallas, TX
2,161
Votes |
5,191
Posts
Ronald Rohde
#3 Commercial Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Dallas, TX
Replied
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I see. Do all due diligence items have to be specifically stated/listed or can some items be assumed that they are part of due diligence?

 Nothing is assumed

  • Ronald Rohde
  • Loading replies...