Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

93
Posts
33
Votes
Rawn Wilson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Pearland, TX
33
Votes |
93
Posts

Commercial lending practice

Rawn Wilson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Pearland, TX
Posted

I have done single family BRRRR and am familiar with the process. I stumbled across a deal on commercial property and I want to do the same strategy. All of the commercial lenders I have talked to have told me they will only lend me 70% of invested money (purchase price plus rehab costs). The new appraised value does not matter because commercial real estate is volatile and they want me to have 20% real money in the investment. There has to be a way to do this. What are some creative ideas? Here are the numbers. Purchase 250k 80k rehab. 330k total cash invested. I would need a 475k evaluation after to get all my cash back out. I believe the property to be worth that after rehab.

  • Rawn Wilson
  • Loading replies...