Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
56
Votes |
73
Posts

CVS/Walgreens Portfolio...Too Good to Be True?

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

A broker recently sent me a list of sevral CVS and Walgreens properties for sale throughout the U.S. I'm currently eyeing several of the CVS properties, but they just seem too good to be true. All the Walgreens are listed for over $5M (that makes sense), a few of the CVS are listed at ~$3.4, but many of them are around $1M, some even less and that seems suspicious.

All are absolute NNN corporate leases with 15+ years on the lease with fairly large lots and CAPs above 5%. A few of them are in areas that aren't that great but the rest seem to be in decent locations.

What's the deal here? Most of the the Walgreens and CVS I've seen are going for at least $3M, trying to figure out why these are going for so much less. Anyone have any idea?

Loading replies...