Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

94
Posts
39
Votes
Charles H.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Orlando, FL
39
Votes |
94
Posts

Biggerpockets calculator for 5+ units (commercial)

Charles H.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Orlando, FL
Posted

Hello all,

Couple questions when analyzing 5+ units deal...

- Capex: no matter how many deal analysis I perform with the BP rental calculator for 5-30 units, I usually end up far from the asking price. I noticed that the Capex reserve were included in the operating expenses while i read many times that it should not be included in the NOI, and therefore should not be counted toward the property price. Any insight on this?

- future assumptions: What do you guys believe is best for Annual income growth, PV growth and Expense growth ?

By plugging in a 2% for all them like explained in webinar for small multifamily building, it should not work since a 2% annual income and 2% annual expenses growths would make a 0% NOI differencial (therefore no added value).

Do you guys ultimately think the BP calculator is not the best in order to calculate a commercial multifamily deal?

Thanks for your insights,

Charles.

  • Charles H.
  • Loading replies...