Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15,174
Posts
11,257
Votes
Joel Owens
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
11,257
Votes |
15,174
Posts

Current tax reform status 12-2-2017 / Senate Passes Resolution

Joel Owens
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
ModeratorPosted

Dear ICSC Member,

In the wee hours of this morning the U.S. Senate passed its version of a tax reform bill by a 51-49 margin along party lines. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) was the only Republican to vote against it due to his concerns about adding to the budget deficit.

The only amendment on carried interest that was voted on was offered by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI). It was defeated.

Modifications approved overnight that potentially impact real estate include:

  • A deduction up to $10,000 in property taxes paid to state and local governments (SALT). This provision reflects the treatment of property taxes in the House-passed bill.
  • Increasing the deduction for small business owners' qualified business income from 17.4 percent in the underlying bill to 23 percent. However, the deduction won't be widely available to commercial real estate firms or partnerships that rely on "contractors" rather than "employees."
  • Extending 100 percent expensing for qualified business property by four more years, gradually decreasing over time, adding to the five years included in the underlying bill. We believe most ICSC members would opt out of expensing to retain interest deduction.


There are two possible next steps: 1) Members of the House and Senate meet to reconcile their two different approaches. The final product that emerges is then voted upon by both chambers; 2) The House simply yields to the Senate version. This second option presents a quicker resolution, with only the House having to vote. We expect the reconciliation process to begin this coming week.

ICSC wants to thank you for responding to its various alerts to shape the outcome of tax reform. More than 7,000 emails were sent to the House and Senate during the past few weeks. Your emails and calls helped stave off attempts to make the carried interest and active loss limitations provisions more severe. There is nothing like hearing from constituents and your actions had a very beneficial effect!

Sincerely,
Betsy Laird

Senior Vice President, Global Public Policy

business profile image
NNN Invest
5.0 stars
3 Reviews

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

16
Posts
4
Votes
Kegan Russell
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Grand Rapids, MI
4
Votes |
16
Posts
Kegan Russell
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Grand Rapids, MI
Replied

The depreciation schedule in the senate bill is a massive change that combined with the new rental income taxation rates, could increase cash flow something like 12.6% for investors in the top bracket and non-residential commercial properties.

In low cap rate areas this could really produce some crazy high taxable losses for the top income earners. Such as NY City Sky Scrapers.

Multifamily does not benefit as much and I think there will start to be some action as it has been a quiet 12 months for most markets in that sector. 

My personal thoughts, I like the senate bill much better but only for selfish reasons.

I have a feeling this is going to be like the start of 83.  3 good years of a juiced economy, brakes get stomped in 86 with the reform act and then I'm sure some you remember 87.  I also think Trump is a 1 term president and nothing would delight him more than to claim 4 years of a prospering economy.  After that, not his problem.  

Loading replies...