Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

34
Posts
1
Votes
Tamas Z.
  • Seattle, WA
1
Votes |
34
Posts

Best ways to handle triple-net where "area%" is not a fair split

Tamas Z.
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Hello all,

I'm new to this field, and have just one commercial property. There is a lot of learning to be done, and I'm looking forward to learning from everyone!

My basic question is, what are the recommended strategies for dealing with situations where the regular triple-net "pay prorated to rentable space area" isn't actually the fair split.

Specifically, I've got two roughly-equal-sized spaces, but one of them is a business that contributes the vast majority of the electrical bill, and having them split it evenly with the other tenant, in standard triple-net fashion, doesn't seem right.

One option I've been considering is to just have the meter split, so each of the units just gets their own bill, and then the electric bill is just no longer part of the operational costs equation. Is that a common, or even recommended practice? What are the pitfalls? It might be a really expensive thing to do... does the cost of making that change officially fall on the tenants, or the landlord? I assume it's the landlord, but if it's generally pretty affordable, I don't mind doing it, to avoid the headaches.

All the best, thanks for your time! Really looking forward to learning more!

Loading replies...