Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Jenni Burke
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Which Is Better? Sell owner-carry, or do a 1041 into STR?

Jenni Burke
Posted

I need perspective on which route is better from the vantage point of 1) tax liability and 2) maintaining long-term value in the Estate. 

A close family member is aging and wants to get rid of their office buildings, valued at $1 million. They have an offer from the current lessee for $200,000 and an owner-carry loan which would double their current monthly payments received. They'd no longer have to worry about maintaining the old property, which is what they want.

However, as the co-heir to the estate, my concern is they'd be hit hard with taxes on the sale and the longterm value of the estate would essentially evaporate (through taxes and cash received but no asset anymore).

I would love to instead help them sell the offices traditionally (get paid the full sales price up front), and then do a 1041 exchange with that million, purchasing a nice and new home in a nearby resort to be run as an STR/VRBO. I would offer to manage the STR for them (at whatever is the standard commission), and based on my AirDNA data, we would still bring them in that "double the current monthly payments"... plus I would be earning an additional revenue stream, plus there's a solid paid-for piece of property that should retain value and gain equity over time.

Does anyone have insights or perspective on this that could be helpful when I talk with them and help them consider the benefits of a 1041 instead of just selling out of the real estate, and pocketing whatever's left after Uncle Sam takes his piece? I want to be super respectful because it's THEIR property, but I also want to help them think strategically so they don't lose a ton in taxes and the family loses out on an otherwise very valuable portion of what they've worked so hard to build. I realize it's a sensitive subject...Please be kind. :) Thank you!

  • Jenni Burke
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    8,977
    Posts
    9,352
    Votes
    Dave Foster
    #1 1031 Exchanges Contributor
    • Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges
    • St. Petersburg, FL
    9,352
    Votes |
    8,977
    Posts
    Dave Foster
    #1 1031 Exchanges Contributor
    • Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges
    • St. Petersburg, FL
    Replied

    @Jenni Burke, A sale and 1031 exchange would indefinitely defer the tax.  And this would indeed go through death when the tax is eliminated by the step up in basis for the heirs.  

    A sale and owner carry will recognize all the tax.  Some of it may be delayed.  But a lot will not.

    So from a pure tax perspective for both current and future owners a sale and 1031 is the most efficient way to handle that.

    • Dave Foster
    business profile image
    The 1031 Investor
    5.0 stars
    87 Reviews

    Loading replies...