Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

25
Posts
14
Votes

Low Income Housing- Would you Invest?

Posted

It is apparent that the motivator in real estate investing is gaining financial freedom. Great ROIs are goal….hot up and coming areas are ideal….BUT….how does creating NICE, low income housing (sfr or multi) fit into this dream of investing for big profit? 

I rarely see anyone talking about this strategy or showing any interest in it. I know it’s possible because I’ve seen it done in my city, but overall I feel like the popularity in this is  L O W. 

Does anyone have any experience in this? This is a goal of mine…to create more nice homes/apts for low income families.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,055
Posts
41,056
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,056
Votes |
28,055
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

I don't have the answer, but I can tell you that it's generally larger investors with the ability to navigate government funding to supplement rents, and they have so many units that they can take reduced rents and still turn a profit. Large companies are building these new facilities across the country. In my area, a nice 2bed/1bath apartment will cost $800+. These new income-based facilities are renting the same units for as low as $550. They get away with it because government is using tax-payer dollars to supplement the rent.

My problem with this?

1. The properties are built with money from outside the state using outside contractors and outside materials. 

2. The property is managed by a company outside the state. They hire one local employee (at a really low salary) to handle basics like showings, inspections, and collecting applications. Everything else is handled by a team in another state.

3. Rent money is collected and sent to another state. Nothing stays here except the low salary of one employee.

4. Our local tax dollars supplement the rent, and then goes outside the state.

You get the idea. Everything goes out of state. It would make so much more sense for states to supplement existing Landlords, allowing them to improve their rentals, then teaching them how to apply for state dollars to supplment rent and become an income-based provider. This would keep local money local.

Long story short, you can't do it as a small investor unless you're willing to run a charity. It's very difficult to provide low-income housing and build a profit at the same time.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
165 Reviews

Loading replies...