Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Martin Enoghase
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Seller refusing to move out since close of escrow.

Martin Enoghase
Posted

We bought our dream house in Rancho Cucamonga and closed escrow since August 19, 2021. We agreed to Seller's contingencies such as property sold as is, with a 30-day stay after escrow without pay. It's 34 days after closing and seller has not moved out. What can we do?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,829
Posts
15,800
Votes
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
15,800
Votes |
9,829
Posts
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by @Darius Ogloza:

The seller's refusal to sign a reasonable addendum providing for rent payments on overstays should have alerted you to the problem you ultimately encountered here.  Why did you close after that unreasonable act by the seller?   

 Exactly. You made a big mistake by closing without your ducks in a row. Said ducks should have included:

1. A set amount of time for the seller to occupy the house as a tenant, paying a specified rent and deposit and carrying renter's insurance;

2. A set portion of the closing proceeds to be held in escrow by a third party until released by both you and the seller.

3. A post-occupancy inspection for damages.

4. A clause holding seller responsible for all damages, including attorneys fees, related to removing the seller from the house.

Now you may still get all of those things in a court of law; a person cannot sell their house, benefit from the proceeds, and then squat on the property (even in California!). But now you will have to do things the hard way. I would have a discussion with your agent and their broker about picking up some of the legal costs for removal and/or perhaps discussing the issue with the state licensing board. Any agent worthwhile should have given you this fiduciary advice. But you will have trouble if there was an addendum prepared, they refused to sign and you closed anyway. That would demonstrate the agent looking out for your interests and you proceeded anyway. 

business profile image
Skyline Properties

Loading replies...