Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
2
Votes
Jennifer Soltis
  • Investor
  • Painesville, OH
2
Votes |
12
Posts

GOING BIG OR GOING PART WAY WITH FIRST MULTI-UNIT

Jennifer Soltis
  • Investor
  • Painesville, OH
Posted

Hello all,

I am looking to purchase my first multi-unit and not sure if I should go big or go half way to get the momentum going. The smaller 3 unit is 15.58% CoC. Closer to home and in the city. The 6 unit is 19.84% CoC and would take all my reserves but this would grow quickly to reinvest in the next one which has $1,000 a month cash flow. And it has a commercial front that needs rented. This is in a more rural area. Both properties will have no showings until an offer is accepted. Thank you in advance for the feedback.

User Stats

20
Posts
21
Votes
Ryder Cotton
  • Realtor
  • Nashville TN Long Beach, CA
21
Votes |
20
Posts
Ryder Cotton
  • Realtor
  • Nashville TN Long Beach, CA
Replied

Hey Jennifer!

I hope you're doing well.

IMO: Both properties have great CoCROI; however, if the 6 unit is going completely wipe your reserves, then it may be best to consider the tri-plex. What would really suck is if you had a non-paying tenant on your 6-unit and didn't have the reserves to cover the costs. Then you're in the hole immediately. Bigger reward, but bigger risk. Since the other property is in the city, it should be easier to rent out faster in the event of a vacancy. Either way, I don't know the areas or your risk tolerance. 

Let me know your thoughts,

User Stats

12
Posts
2
Votes
Jennifer Soltis
  • Investor
  • Painesville, OH
2
Votes |
12
Posts
Jennifer Soltis
  • Investor
  • Painesville, OH
Replied

Thank you those were my thoughts as well. I really don’t want to get that risky with the first one but I am working full time to cover those “extras”

BiggerPockets logo
BiggerPockets
|
Sponsored
Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

User Stats

20
Posts
21
Votes
Ryder Cotton
  • Realtor
  • Nashville TN Long Beach, CA
21
Votes |
20
Posts
Ryder Cotton
  • Realtor
  • Nashville TN Long Beach, CA
Replied

@Jennifer Soltis 

Okay. If you're comfortable and confident that you're able to cover the expenses in the event something happens  then I would say, Go for it. :)  

Do you have your financing in place? 

User Stats

12
Posts
2
Votes
Jennifer Soltis
  • Investor
  • Painesville, OH
2
Votes |
12
Posts
Jennifer Soltis
  • Investor
  • Painesville, OH
Replied

I thought I had financing in place. They called me today and apologized they thought the properties were 75k a unit and they do not lend on anything less. I told him if they were that then they would not cash flow. I don't know they must have had a few bad deals.  Thanks