Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 3 years ago,
Tax Implication Question
So I have had possibly a great idea and want to see what everyone thinks. I would urge tax professionals/ asset managers/ lawyers to respond to this is possible.
I am newer to real estate investing and currently have two homes under my ownership. Both were/are live in flips that get reappraised around October once the flips are done and the market has received all the data it needs to value them. House 1 was a complete gut and also my first home ever. I purchased it under a 5 year ARM loan back in 2019 as it had a preferable rate at the time. I then added a HELOC after the flip to purchase house 2 with no/low money down. Currently the rent covers the payments on House 1 and it is close to break even from a tax perspective.
House 2 was a significantly larger and more luxurious home that was purchased with plenty of room to upgrade and on a 30 year fixed mortgage. As the work is completed the return on the sale would be about $30,000-$40,000. With this being the case I intended to leverage that in to a new property and continue my expansion.
Instead of doing a 1031 exchange, could I in theory:
1. Open a HELOC on Home 2
2. Use that HELOC to pay down Home 1
3. Sell Home 2 to cover both the Loans on the home
4. Utilize the now open equity in Home 1 to leverage a new property.
If I am thinking of this correctly wouldn't opening the HELOC on home 2 lower the tax liability on the sale of the home? It wouldn't mean a ton in savings but just wanted to know if this is a way to lower tax implications from live in flips that last less than a year.