Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 3 years ago,
Data driven investing
I'm looking to buy my first investment property this year. I'll probably out of state due to high prices and high taxes in my home state. I'm a data scientist, so I started building a dataset to start exploring where in the country I might make my first purchase. I was expecting all my metrics to turn up Austin, Nashville, and Boise as top performers. But the top 10 regions for each metric are turning up all sorts of places I hadn't thought of and that aren't in the news. Some examples of regions that end up in the top 10:
- Fastest population growth (Jackson County, Georgia)
- Highest net migration rate (Horry County, South Carolina)
- Fastest job growth (Eddy County, New Mexico)
- Fastest income growth (Mineral County, West Virginia)
- Fastest home price growth (Grays Harbor County, Washington)
- Fastest rent growth (Franklin County, Massachusetts)
- Highest rent to price ratio (Jefferson County, Arkansas)
Is this kind of data based searching worthwhile? Or is it a recipe for analysis paralysis?