Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

53
Posts
34
Votes
Ben Lin
34
Votes |
53
Posts

Big city or small city

Ben Lin
Posted

Hello everyone. If you had lets say 2M to invest, would you buy a rental property (maybe a fourplex or a six units building) in big and mature cities like SF, LA, Brooklyn, or you'd buy several single family homes in cities like Huntsville, Gainesville, Cape Coral (or any small city)? I know about appreciation VS cash flow, but I'd be interested to hear your personal choice and why? My investing brain is looking for the next Austin while collecting rent for a few years (LOL who doesnt), but my ego is looking to buy a nice building in big cities like LA or SF. Would love to hear from you guys! 

Loading replies...