Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Sherry Siegert
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Cash flow and Cash on Cash Return- when is less acceptable?

Sherry Siegert
Posted

We've heard the typical 1% rule and the grand slam 15% CoC return, but under what conditions would you go for a deal when these are not met?

Long term investor, not looking to quit my job or put a lot of effort in...looking at MFH and the numbers just don't add up but these properties are flying off the shelf so I am wondering if I am missing something?

Exhibit A: 4 unit for 405K, 25% down, rents ~3200 (but can possibly hit 4000), property tax 2.7%, and all other things accounted for (mgmt, CapEx, etc) our cash on cash return is less than 1%- why would someone buy this property? And why am I being asked to go over asking so that I may have a chance? I'm not a newbie but I am no professional either. Looking for your thoughts.

Loading replies...