Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Please log in or sign up for a free account to continue.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on .

Account Closed
1
Votes |
28
Posts

Which has better investment value in LA area- condo or house?

Account Closed
Posted

Currently shopping for a condo or house in Studio City/Toluca Lake/Burbank area that will serve as a primary residence.

Condo (2-3 bed, 2 bath) price range 600K-700K (Studio City/Toluca Lake)

House (3 bed, 2 bath) price range <1M (Burbank)

Long term, I am looking to build a portfolio of properties by buying a new property every 3-5 years in the LA area with savings from my 9-5 job.

Originally, I had planned on a condo, but concerned in regards to housing price projections in the next few years.

What are people's opinion of investment values of these property types in these areas?

Thanks!