Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/597bd/597bd4067f6719222f8c18f4bb7dca20484ab0f8" alt="Maysoon K Salah's profile image"
The Proof of Funds Dilemma
If proof of income letters are barrier to wholesaling, then would a possible solution be to offer 10% and first right of refusal on deals to someone who can offer a proof of income? What is a acceptable percentage/incentive to using the proof cash exists, but they may or not be the buyer? Therefore, little to no risk on their part to work their money with a wholesaler that will give them a percentage of their profits of each deal just for using proof that sufficient cash exists to close on the deal. From my understanding (and please correct me if I am wrong), the final buyer of the deal may change but the cash offer does not.
Your thoughts and opinions would be appreciated. Thank you .