My Unpopular Opinion Against "Cities are Dying!"

My Unpopular Opinion Against "Cities are Dying!"

Architect · Philadelphia, PA · Member since 2016 · 50 posts · 36 votes

These days everyone loves to say it. People are leaving the city for the suburbs.
In my opinion, people who left cities during the pandemic would have done so eventually anyway.

For those who left, the spacious and calmer life of suburbia has been a daydream for some time now. As nightlife and concerts come to a halt, and dining at your favorite restaurant means sitting at a picnic table in a parking lane during January, their decision is accelerated.

For those who left, the city was just a stop along the way. A convenient place for employment and the occasional $9 IPA. 

In comes the pandemic. People lose their jobs, and their ability to stumble out of the Uber and pack into a sweaty night club. "The cost of living in (insert major city here) is too high!" And off they fly towards the 'burbs like its the 1950's.

Either that, or their destiny has always been the house with the fake shutters and the fence and the front lawn and the dog. And the shed for all the stuff they must now buy.

Yes- remote work culture has also left us with a location identity crisis. But if I'm moving my 9-5 to my spare bedroom, the last thing I want to is to be stranded on a suburban island where it will take me a 15-minute drive to get to the nearest chain restaurant in some strip mall. Hmm what do I want for lunch today, Applebees or Buffalo Wild Wings? 

The American embrace of urban living was thriving before the pandemic. People finally started to realize the health and social benefits of living near walkable amenities, public transit, and cultural diversity. Maybe we were starting to learn from our urban ancestors in Europe, where the city is an archive of mankind's past achievements and the pedestal for future aspirations.

Cities still are, and will continue to be epicenters for technological innovation and higher education. They will guard the greatest museums which carry the most precious arts. They will be the pit stops for the most successful touring musicians- and the path to stardom for the young and aspiring artists. They will showcase the most iconic architecture that is so unique to the time and place, their means and methods can never again be replicated. They will be the destinations for curious travelers seeking to experience the soul of a 'place' they have never been. Finally, how many suburbs have pro sports teams in the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, etc?

Sure, people will rebut this post with stats of migration patterns and real estate sales. I too have access to google.

My point is this: to look at the data and make a blanket statement about cities being doomed ignores the "why" behind all this. Nobody would disagree with me if I said people are leaving places they can't afford, while their employment is unstable and most social events are dead for the foreseeable future- so they look for a new place.

For some people, that place happens to be the adjacent suburb. Cheaper than the city, but they can still sing Tom Petty covers at the local dive bar karaoke night. 

However anyone who values what urban living has to offer will seek the same lifestyle and conveniences elsewhere. Maybe somewhere in-between a city and a small town. The places that come to mind are Charlottesville VA, New Hope PA, Asbury Park NJ.

Others will remain in place or seek an alternative where they can still walk a couple of blocks for groceries, and get their social fix at the local dog park while keeping 6' distance. They will continue to support their favorite local grub spots for take-out or a cocktail to go (and tip well). They will work on that business plan and network with like-minded entrepreneurs at the outdoor seating area of their local microbrewery.  

Everybody
else would have eventually left the city anyway.

4Reply
19 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Realtor · Asbury Park, NJ · Member since 2019 · 63 posts · 44 votes
    4y

    Hey Matt, 

    I agree with your sentiment that remote work culture has shifted the landscape of home desirability. As someone who lives in Asbury Park, I went from being the only year round resident on my street 5 years ago, to one of many who call this "city by the sea" their year round residence. Hybrid work, less taxes, more desirable location (50 bars and an ocean within a mile) create an opportunity for New Yorkers to leave expensive crowded living environments for a hybrid living area to match their hybrid work style. 

  • Chris MasonPro Member
    Moderator
    Lender · CA · Member since 2015 · 9k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    4y

    No one serious thinks that Philadelphia or Oakland are going to be depopulated ghost towns within 10 years.

    Via the mechanism of people voting with their wallets, incomes are ultimately what drives both home values and rents. And the voting may occur differently, depending on life-stages, or demographics.

    For example ("life-stage theory") one totally plausible scenario is that for higher income earners renting, they vote in the city to a greater degree. And, moving forward, those same higher income earners +5 years down the road, are voting in the burbs. Perhaps moving forward renting in the city is more enshrined as a 20something thing, then when it's time to buy (current median is ~32.5 years old) you move to the 'burbs. If that pans out, it would mean greater rent appreciation in the urban cores, and greater SFR appreciation farther out.

    A more "demographic" theory, and we've seen this in history before, is that the preferences of higher income earners have switched (perhaps COVID accelerated it). As mentioned in OP, back in the 1950s it was the suburbs that were hot. That meant lower income earners were "bid" (gentrified) out of the suburbs, forced into the urban cores. The urban cores, in turn, saw disinvestment, blight, bad stuff. Roughly the opposite has happened since the 1980s -- the urban cores are what the high income earners want, so the folks already there (who had been gentrified out of the suburbs just a generation before) have been getting gentrified out of the urban core, into the suburbs. And on, and on, and on, back and forth.... I have no idea what "cool" will be for my kids, but it's not going to be what's "cool" for my generation. Has anyone else noticed a return to young person fashion trends borrowed directly from the 1970s and 1980s? Things that "our" generation think of as old, tired, boring, etc? To the kids, it's back in fashion. Next time you see a group of teenage girls, look out for pants that stop at the calf, and a waste that's so high it covers their belly button -- oh, look, it's 1982 again. I'm assuming "big fizzy hair with LOTS of hair spray" is coming down the pipeline, within 5 years or so. Maybe the suburbs being 'hot' again is just the latest iteration of ridiculous looking (to my "elderly" eyes) jeans. Here today, gone tomorrow. But how long will "today" last? I guess that's the big question. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.