Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

61
Posts
49
Votes
Michael Johnson
  • New to Real Estate
49
Votes |
61
Posts

Seeking Advice: Which option is the better investment?

Michael Johnson
  • New to Real Estate
Posted

Hi everyone, I wanted to get your thoughts on house hacking in an expensive market (Chicago) where it isn’t easy to live for free. Please let me know your thoughts between the two options:

1) Buy a smaller duplex with an FHA here in Chicago to tie up as little capital as possible so that I can invest the rest of my capital for higher returns in Milwaukee. I can get better CoC/cash flow there but it also requires more money up front with having to put 25% down on investment properties - I currently have one duplex in Milwaukee.

2) Buy a much more expensive 4 unit (700-750k) with an FHA in Chicago, cash flow around $150-200/door once I move out BUT get far more principle pay down , gross rent and appreciation. I don't calculate principle pay down or appreciation in my calculations for CoC so the numbers are off putting when using a BP calc.

I know expensive markets struggle with the 1% rule but they provide higher gross rents, principle pay down and appreciation (in general), which can increase net worth a lot quicker than cash flowing say $200-300/door with a high CoC return. I've been leaning toward doing the 4 unit in Chicago and forcing appreciation to increasing rents as tenants move but wanted to get other opinions. Hope to try a BRRRR once I get experience rehabbing my FHA. Thanks in advance!

Loading replies...