Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

66
Posts
55
Votes
Michael Johnson
  • Investor
  • Chicago
55
Votes |
66
Posts

Seeking Advice: Which option is the better investment?

Michael Johnson
  • Investor
  • Chicago
Posted

Hi everyone, I wanted to get your thoughts on house hacking in an expensive market (Chicago) where it isn’t easy to live for free. Please let me know your thoughts between the two options:

1) Buy a smaller duplex with an FHA here in Chicago to tie up as little capital as possible so that I can invest the rest of my capital for higher returns in Milwaukee. I can get better CoC/cash flow there but it also requires more money up front with having to put 25% down on investment properties - I currently have one duplex in Milwaukee.

2) Buy a much more expensive 4 unit (700-750k) with an FHA in Chicago, cash flow around $150-200/door once I move out BUT get far more principle pay down , gross rent and appreciation. I don't calculate principle pay down or appreciation in my calculations for CoC so the numbers are off putting when using a BP calc.

I know expensive markets struggle with the 1% rule but they provide higher gross rents, principle pay down and appreciation (in general), which can increase net worth a lot quicker than cash flowing say $200-300/door with a high CoC return. I've been leaning toward doing the 4 unit in Chicago and forcing appreciation to increasing rents as tenants move but wanted to get other opinions. Hope to try a BRRRR once I get experience rehabbing my FHA. Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,086
Posts
2,488
Votes
Jonathan Klemm
  • Contractor
  • Chicago, IL
2,488
Votes |
4,086
Posts
Jonathan Klemm
  • Contractor
  • Chicago, IL
ModeratorReplied

Hey @Michael Johnson, great post and very valid questions.  Personally, I always like to start with the end in mind.  Is your ultimate goal long term wealth or short term cash flow.....then figure out which strategy gets you where you want to go the fastest.

For me, I've always been focused on long-term wealth so I purchased heavily distressed properties in always appreciating neighborhoods like Bucktown and logan square.  I always tried to rehab as much as possible, to help eliminate short term expenses and large capex issues (at least for the next 5-10 years).

My advice would be go the FHA duplex route and then invest the rest. Finding a 4 unit that you can use an FHA loan, in highly desirable neighborhoods in Chicago is almost impossible.

If you arent lined up with a lender yet, definitely talk to @Michael Facchini.

business profile image
Quality Builders
5.0 stars
34 Reviews

Loading replies...