Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
2
Votes
Reza Push
2
Votes |
4
Posts

Weighing renting and buying in Los Angeles for a primary

Reza Push
Posted

Basically the LA market is nuts and cannot decide what is the best decision for us. Through Covid we have been staying in a family member's vacant home here in LA and previously rented. Obviously as things open up, we will need our own place. SO's job is on the westside where things are insanely expensive. I have maybe $300k cash on hand.

The way I see it, we have a couple of options:

  • Buy a primary SFH that we can rent out at some point for a house hack. Problems are that even up to $1M, it's not going to be a very nice place. I have tried for a year to find these illusive "off market" of "fixer" gems. They do not exist unless you go deep in the hood. Sorry, but I am just not going to live there.
  • Buy another rental or two in the other market (or any market, really) I have some SFH and rent a place for ourselves at around ~$4000/month. This is obviously a huge amount of money to spend on an apartment, but allows us to acquire another 1-2 units and increase cashflow, though at a large living cost.

I like the idea of a primary because I can get a HELOC for quick access to my equity as needed. But in this market without spending $1.25M+ I won't be able to live in a very desirable part of town. This would drain my cash reserves, which I don't want to do. I have no problem with a duplex or triplex, but it's the same issue. You'll have to spend ~$1.5M or more to get something decent here.

Surely others of you live in LA and understand trying to balance living in a safe area but also trying to expand your rental portfolio. Interested in what you may be doing.

    Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    4
    Posts
    2
    Votes
    Reza Push
    2
    Votes |
    4
    Posts
    Reza Push
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Dan Schweit:

    Hey Reza, I can empathize with your dilemma. I have been in Los Angeles my whole life. I spent my early 20's living by the beach, renting, then just got further and further away, till now when we are in santa clarita. Which obviously is much more bang for our buck, but not really LA anymore. I think Grant Cardone says that owning the home you live in is one of the worst investments possible. So, if you decide to rent, and just use the money to invest, you can really jumpstart things. I honestly wish i would have done that when I was younger. But, I also had a pretty good ride on So Cal appreciation over the last 12 years as well. I personally don't invest in CA anymore as I was able to develop some good relationships in NV and buy some stuff out there over the years. Your decision really comes down to your specific goals. Build your portfolio faster, or do it slower but have a place you own to call home.

    Dan I appreciate the information and your thoughts. Grant Cardone says a lot of things, but I don't see how owning your own home is classified as the "worst investment possible" since here in LA I have a known quantity of spending at least $4k/month to live. 

    Loading replies...