Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

27
Posts
8
Votes
Michael Archard
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Framingham, MA
8
Votes |
27
Posts

Real Estate Commission: 4% vs 5% vs 6%

Michael Archard
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Framingham, MA
Posted

I have always offered 4% agent commission on the sales of my flips and personal residences (7 deals and counting) and have been able to get over asking price on 5 out of the 7. I have been told by a few real estate agents that offering a higher commission (i.e., 5-6%) will result in a higher sale price, and pay back the increased commission and then some. I have even seen some data that tries to support this, but the data was supplied by an agent and was not normalized by property value or asking price (the higher priced homes tended to have the higher commissions offered). 

I'd like to hear from both agents and non-agents to hear what proof may be out there to justify this strategy, or is this simply a ploy used by agents to make a few more bucks?

Thanks,
Mike 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,412
Posts
4,013
Votes
Charlie MacPherson
  • China, ME
4,013
Votes |
3,412
Posts
Charlie MacPherson
  • China, ME
Replied

@Michael Archard I have never heard of any correlation between commissions offered and sale price.  Honestly, it sounds like self-serving BS.

I think there may be one between abnormally high and low commissions and number of showings.  Whether that correlates with sales price remains to be proven.

Let's say that the prevailing commissions are X%.  I strongly suspect that offering 2% less than X% will result in agents being reluctant to show the listing.  Likewise, I strongly suspect offering 2% above X% will incentivize agents to show.

A better way to incentivize agents is to offer a bonus.  When I sold my last personal home in Massachusetts, I already had written a contract on our new home in Maine.  I needed to generate activity fast, so I offered a $1,000 cash bonus (paid at closing) if the property was under contract by a particular date.

When I was selling residential real estate, I made it a practice to not look at commissions when recommending properties to buyers.  If I based my decisions on what I'd make, I'd be violating my fiduciary duties to my client.  However, I also protected myself with a buyer's broker agreement which stipulated that I was to be paid a minimum of $X,XXX or Y%.  If the seller was offering less, the buyer was responsible for making up the difference.

Loading replies...