MHP valuation. Please help me analyze this deal

MHP valuation. Please help me analyze this deal

Castlegar BC, British Columbia · Member since 2017 · 18 posts · 0 votes

Hi BP community,

I am analyzing and collecting info on a small MHP in my area that I am interested in. Im asking for your help and advice on this deal.

The park is on 7 acres, currently has 12 pads, all tenant owned, $375/month pad rent, tenants do own yard work and maintenance, tenant pays for electric, owner pays for water/sewer/garbage/roads. On the property is also a large house. My family would move into this house, and potential to have a 3bed basement suite, $1600/month including utilities. As of now, the current owner splits the income 50/50, residential/commercial, so the expenses for the MHP are essentially 50% (if that is right?).

Water is a community system, no well. Sewer is x4 septics, one of those is for the house. The owner has been pumping the tanks every 4 years, one a year. There is potential to install water meters for each pad, and bill back water to the tenants. Park is on a paved road, road needs maintenance or full repair. I am looking into expansion potential. I am assuming I could get 6-8 more pads on the property, just due to the layout of the current park. I am budgeting $15,000 for each lot creation. RV or tiny homes are of interest to me as well. Potential to have a fenced RV storage or a mini storage. Estimation $600/month for income, maybe more.

Asking price is $950,000. The owners 50/50 income split, would mean they think the MHP is $475,000 and the house is $475,000. In my opinion, overhead map, the split could easily be 20/80, residential/commercial, especially if the expansion goes through.

Comparables of just single family houses in the area are selling for the $400,000 range. The house on the property is pretty decent. A large deck would need to have vinyl decking replace. There is a large in ground pool that is fully fenced and in good shape. I would be ok to pay in the $400,000 range for the house and the land it is on. The park, according my valuation is not worth the owners asking price of $475,000.

Owner provided their income/expenses:

$950,000 asking price

$54,000/year pad rents

11,000/year expenses for whole property (prop tax, insurance, water and garbage. Owner did not include any septic maintenance or other park maintenance, so I dont think this is fully accurate.

Based on owners 50/50 and income/expenses, they say their NOI is $49,000/year with a 10% cap. This only includes the 12 pad rents and not income on the house or RV storage.

I was hoping for some help evaluating this property. If you need more info, I would be glad to provide that.

Thanks,

Steve

0Reply
39 views

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · San Diego, CA · Member since 2014 · 592 posts · 765 votes
    6y

    The MHP is small. For this size of property, I think you'd want at least a 7-8% cap. NOI of $49K on $54K lot rent is completely bogus. The average MHP exp/rev ratio is closer to 40%, meaning your NOI is probably closer to $32,400. You can probably confirm this by going back further than the TTM. On a 7% cap, that's $463K, so $475K estimate is close, but on the high end IMO. A good outcome for you would be at an 8% cap, closer to $405K.

    If you think the $400K house valuation is accurate, $805K sale price is a really good outcome for you, and somewhere between $850K and $900K being closer to a fair value depending on how you value the house.  Good luck!

  • Castlegar BC, British Columbia · Member since 2017 · 18 posts · 0 votes
    6y

    Hi Frank,

    I appreciate your reply.

    Im mostly confused why or how the seller justifies this property a 50/50 residential/commercial to calculate expenses. 12 pads and 1 house. Even if I lived in the house, there is still 12 pad units paying 12 expenses, if that make sense. Is it because they value the house at $475,000?

    I found out today, the house has two septics, the park has 3.

    Water and garbage annual payment is $5800. Seller is saying that $2900 is for park and $2900 is for the house. This does not seem right to me. Seller is basing all expenses like this.

    Seller is saying NOI is ($54,000 - $6500 (half of $11,000 full expenses) = $47,500) based the park being split 50/50, their value for park alone is $475,000. That makes their cap rate at 10%.

    How much really does the house factor into all of this, it cant be 50%. Should I then base the cap rate on the full property value of $950,000? That would result in a cap of 5%.

    Im not sure how to proceed and how to value this property correctly. Any more help is greatly appreciated.

    Steve

  • Investor · San Diego, CA · Member since 2014 · 592 posts · 765 votes
    6y
    Originally posted by @Steven Lalonde:

    How much really does the house factor into all of this, it cant be 50%. Should I then base the cap rate on the full property value of $950,000? That would result in a cap of 5%.

    This is an odd one.  I agree with you that cutting every cost in half and saying "that half's for the house" is completely bogus.  I think the best way to continue valuation is to add revenue and expenses from the house as if it were a rental and then add in all expenses, that way you get a full P&L picture and it negates the weird game the seller's trying to play with the expenses. So you would produce a proforma P&L that looks like this:

    Revenue

    - Revenue from house

    - MHP Revenue

    Expenses

    - House-only expenses

    - MHP-only expenses

    - Communal expenses

    Then you can figure your cap rate based off the entire property.  Be mindful to accrue for future replacement of all those septic tanks.  Those things aren't cheap.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.