Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
1
Votes |
28
Posts

Feasibility of CA Real Estate Licensure to Avoid Realtor Fees

Account Closed
Posted

Is there any logic in obtaining a CA Real Estate license to avoid realtor fees (without the intention of becoming a real estate agent)?

Currently have some free time on my hands as I am saving for the purchase of a new primary residence in about 9 months.  Would this be a productive use of my time?  Has anyone done this?  What are the logistics in regards to a broker holding my license?  Will rent out my current property after purchasing a new residence.

TIA!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

952
Posts
1,151
Votes
Jon Schwartz
  • Realtor
  • Los Angeles, CA
1,151
Votes |
952
Posts
Jon Schwartz
  • Realtor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

My mistake, I thought that the status quo was to split the 6% between seller and buyer in Socal due to market.  Therefore, as a buyer there is little advantage in having a real estate license in terms of closing costs, correct?

Any other options for decreasing closing costs through licensure in California?  

 Mitchell, you're right about the split. If you represent yourself in the transaction, as the buyer's agent, you'll get half the commission. So you'll get 2.5% or 3% of the sale price back at closing.

I'm about to take my CA real estate exam, so here's a rundown of the quickest/cheapest way to get your license:

You're required to take three, 45-hour classes. I bought an online program that cost around $400. I got mailed textbooks and took online exams. I'd say each class actually took up 20 hours of time. So, $400 plus 60 hours of time to qualify for the exam.

Once you complete the classes, you can apply to take the exam. The exam in extremely backlogged. The wait is something like 4-6 months now in Socal. The exam and license together cost $305.

Once you're an agent, the cheapest brokerage options are these zero-guidance online brokerages that only charge a fee, $500 at the lowest, when you close the transaction. If you join a brokerage that provides any amount of help with the paperwork, etc., you'll end up having to give them 33% or 50% of your first commission, as well as costs up front for training, etc.

So, at the very cheapest, you're looking at $1200 or so plus 60-80 hours of work. What purchase price are you targeting? Will it be worth the cost for that 2.5% or 3% rebate?

Best,

Jon

Loading replies...