Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Ben Vitale
  • South Hero, VT
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Two offers mutually contingent

Ben Vitale
  • South Hero, VT
Posted

I'm not sure this even makes sense so here goes.

Property for sale is a 57 acre parcel with a subdivision in place for 6 parcels. One of the parcels is an old farmhouse with 3 acres. We are interested in purchasing the entire 57 acres and keeping it all together but financing is problematic due to the excess acreage and the uniqueness of this parcel size in the surrounding area.

Is it possible to make two offers to the seller, one for five of the parcels (54 acres of bare land) and one for the 3 acres w/ house. This would allow us to finance the land in more creative ways while going with conventional financing for the house.

The gotcha is that I don't want to be in a situation where one offer is accepted but the other is not, or both offers are accepted but then one falls through. They need to be "mutually contingent" in some way. Or should it just be one offer?

Obviously I will consult a local real estate attorney before offering but looking for any input on the feasibility of these scenarios. Thanks.

Loading replies...