Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Victor L.
  • dallas, tx
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Rental stress test algorithm help

Victor L.
  • dallas, tx
Posted

Hi all,

I'm currently working on the planning phase of creating a rental stress test algorithm that will essentially output the inflection points where the deal turns from good to bad. The idea is to eventually have it running with a click of a button given certain criteria as I'm running the numbers on a property. I'm primarily focused on SFH but any MF advice/opinions is also appreciated.

The possible cases I have so far are:

-Vacancy (how many months can the property hold before the numbers turn negative)

-capex (how much monthly income can I put aside while still getting at least $100 in cashflow )

-declining rents

Thanks in advance.

Loading replies...