Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Daniel H.
0
Votes |
1
Posts

STR question: Liability for equipment in a locked room?

Daniel H.
Posted

I'd like to add a home gym to a 3BR home I own in NC for when I'm staying in it. When I am not occupying the unit, I intend to rent it out as a STR. The gym would include "dangerous" equipment like free weights.

Let's assume I'm reasonably paranoid about liability lawsuits, etc, but want to stay grounded in legal reality for this question.  If I marketed the unit as 2BR and figured out how to deadbolt the gym room (thinking a remotely controllable lock w/audit logs), would I still need to be concerned w/personal liability from the locked room? Let's also assume the room is always genuinely locked and I'll have a reasonable way to argue this, e.g. something beyond "it should have been locked".

My thoughts:

  1. 1) It's a locked door, literally no one will know there's a gym on the other side
  1. 2) Worst case is that someone broke in, worked out or claimed to work out, and filed a lawsuit saying they used the home gym and injured themself

If I have evidence the person broke into the room (e.g. video from the inside of them breaking the door/lock), would I still be realistically liable?

Loading replies...