Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
1
Votes
Zach Hawrot
1
Votes |
15
Posts

As an investor, is a license worth it simply for the MLS?

Zach Hawrot
Posted

I've read much of the discussions/articles on here regarding the benefits of obtaining your real estate license as an investor. I have one question:

Would it, more likely than not, be worth it to get a license just to have the advantage of the MLS? My thinking that if it leads to 1-3 purchases a year, then that's worth it. Having no access myself, I just wasn't sure how likely it is to find deals on there as opposed to the other ways I'm finding them as discussed on this site.

Appreciate any info!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

21
Posts
7
Votes
Brian Mollo
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
7
Votes |
21
Posts
Brian Mollo
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Replied

Yes, it does seem investors fall into the 'pro-license' side, or the 'why would I need it?' side. I personally find it very useful. While Redfin/Zillow, etc. have become more robust, they have limited information when digging deeper relative to the actual MLS. I don't necessarily use the MLS to source deals in my competitive market, but it is very useful to look up an off-market property's historical listing(s), access tax records, and it will give you a much better snapshot of comps. Additionally those comps will sometimes have 'agent only' comments in the listings, that help you understand the story of it, thus giving you a clearer picture of the subject property and make you more accurate your analysis. Early on I had occasionally listed my own flips and sometimes wrote up the offer on the front end to put the commission into the deal. Also, if there is a realtor association lockbox on a property that is pre-market, I also don't have to have someone show me in. And being part of the Association will give you access to Realtors to source deals for you, as 'one of them'. I do think the positives far outweigh the negatives. The cost is relatively minimal over the course of the year and to obtain one isn't that hard. I'm not sure the argument against it really, although I've heard some elude to the fact that having a license holds them to a higher standard or may interfere with their investor/wholesaler activity... I'm not sure what State they reside in, but if you always disclose your license (and actually do operate with integrity) I'm not sure I understand the counter-argument, or the repercussions of doing both activities. Good luck, Zach!

Loading replies...