Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Leah Robertson
0
Votes |
4
Posts

First Multi-Triplex number good or bad?

Leah Robertson
Posted

The wife and I are looking at buying our first Multi unit. We have two townhouses (different complexes) and a condo that we own and rent out but those were just our homes we used to live in and we kept them to rent them. This is the first purchase that we are buy purely as an investment. The property is a Triplex (2 x 2 BR, 1 x 1BR units) in a nice neighborhood with a new roof and some recent upgrades. Current rents are noticeably below market, for the 2 BRs $800 while identical unit across the street rents $1200 a month. After running four square numbers for a 310k purchase we show a 6.5% Cash on cash with very conservative rent of $2600 total and 2k for "rehab" (though we aren't planning any rehab) If we claim to get the neighbor's rent levels then its 14% Cash on Cash, this is just barely the 1% rule though. I feel like I'm missing something, why it the 1% rule seen as "the minimum" when I could get between 6.5% to 14% ROI?

Help me, what am I missing?

Cheers,

Mike and Leah

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

824
Posts
1,099
Votes
Joe P.
  • Philadelphia, PA
1,099
Votes |
824
Posts
Joe P.
  • Philadelphia, PA
Replied

Theoretically, you could buy a houses at the .5% rule and 2% rule and not make any money with the latter. But its a good gauge to determine whether or not to look more closely at a property.

Lets take your 310k acquisition (assume 25% down, 5% closing) and conservative rent of $2600 as you described. This means your monthly debt service is $1127 (4.125%, 30 year, YMMV). Now set aside 40-50% of rent for all expenses -- CAPEX, maintenance, vacancy, management, utilities, city/licensing costs, et al), somewhere in the $1040 to $1300 range, and you still haven't factored in the taxes/insurance. One could argue the 40-50% setaside for expenses is high, and that could be, so you need to run an independent evaluation on the property to see what's needed.

Also, prepare for 5-10k of an "oh crap" budget for the first year. I bought a duplex that looked fine and even home inspection wise turned up nothing imminent, and then a bunch of imminent things happened. Best to be prepared and ready when it happens, or pleasantly surprised when it doesn't.

Loading replies...