Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 4 years ago,
Close and expensive, or cheap and far?
Hello,
I'm from Buckeye Lake, OH. I'm looking to invest really anywhere in Ohio. Closer the better, but if it's a good deal and the numbers are good, then that seems good too.
I'm looking for multifamily properties in Columbus, OH or Sandusky, OH.
Columbus: closer to me (35 min), more $ to buy, most don't meet 2% rule, but around 1%. Industry seems to be growing and so is population. With higher property cost, would be harder to cash flow well. Properties I'm looking at are average to just below average. 2/1 goes for around $500-700 neighborhood depending.
Sandusky: farther (2:45 hrs), less $ to buy, most exceed 2% or are close to it, not sure if industry is dying or growing, neighborhoods are C-B, but seems mostly poverty, and not necessarily surrounded by worse neighborhoods and other crime. Just kind of a small lake town. I sail up there occasionally. Properties are average to below average. Rents for 2/1 are again $500-750 depending on building.
Better to go in on something cheap, with decent quality and potential to make better, better cash flow, but potentially dying city and a little farther (3 hrs)
OR
something closer, less cash flow, higher mortgage, but more/growing city stability?
If I'm cash flowing well, does it even REALLY matter?
I'm conventionally financing, plan to buy and hold, but don't have much capital (around $15000) to invest. Cheaper, potentially higher cash flowing area seems better option as of right now.
Thoughts? I'd appreciate any. Thanks.