Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

219
Posts
99
Votes
Tyler D.
99
Votes |
219
Posts

Mid-sized city for growth or small city for cashflow?

Tyler D.
Posted

I'm looking at picking up some property in my local town, which is a mid-sized town of about 80k people. The cashflow numbers here are not great, most properties do not break 1%. However population and job growth are both high and will likely continue.

Meanwhile, there is a smaller town a couple hours away of about 20k people with much better cashflow. The average home is about 50% of the price, but the rent is only about 20% lower. I can definitely get 1% on cheaper properties, however the population growth is considerably lower. 

I'm considering going for the smaller town, because the cashflow is much better and I don't think it's going anywhere. Just growing at a smaller rate. What are your thoughts?

Loading replies...