Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on .

User Stats

1,093
Posts
754
Votes
Mark H. Porter
  • Investor
  • SC NC, VA
754
Votes |
1,093
Posts

Due Diligence on 1031/DST

Mark H. Porter
  • Investor
  • SC NC, VA
Posted

I recently received a property memorandum for a DST and was surprised to see the the offering was 23% over the appraised value of the property. It was explained to me that this delta was because of real estate and legal fees necessary for the transaction. I called foul and backed off.


Why would Uncle Sam have a tax rule that allows this?  I know everything is negotiable, but at a 6.5% return on my investment I’m not even eating down any of the principal for years.  Thoughts?