Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

23
Posts
1
Votes
Andrew Nesbitt
  • Antelope, CA
1
Votes |
23
Posts

First deal...is it worth it?

Andrew Nesbitt
  • Antelope, CA
Posted

Seller willing to 100% finance 2 unit property. Gross income currently under market and property is renting $500 per unit. (Seller has some deal with tenant that he gets discounted rate for helping him do handyman stuff on another property.) So currently the the property looks like this.

Gross income $1k
Minus
Taxes & insurance $150
Vacancy $100
Maintenance $150
Mortgage $800
Property management $100

Cash flow -$300

Tenants lease up at the end of 2013, and I can then kick them out/raise rent then.

Market rents would be about $1600 per month, so then it would look like this...

Gross income $1600
minus
Taxes insurance $150
vacancy $100
Maintenance $150
Mortgage $800
property management $160

Cash flow +$260

Note: refinancing would increase cashflow another $150.

Ok, there is one more big caveat. Property is about 2500 miles from me. Is it worth it to pursue this? I don't have much in savings (just over $10k) so I thought this might be a good first rental property for me. Basically a zero down deal(sort of)

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Central Valley, CA
3,729
Votes |
6,037
Posts
Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Central Valley, CA
Replied

Why would you take over a property that is negative cash flow. Seller financing doesn't make it a good deal, even with nothing down. Even at market rents you aren't really cashing flowing (IMO) either.

Your seller is trying to pawn off a problem and make money at the same time. Every landlord says their tenant's rent is too low and they always have good (and often dishonest) reasons why.

If you are buying this for cash flow and not appreciation, I suggest working backwards from your income and expense numbers and make the seller an offer based on covering all expenses and debt service with real cash flow left over. Don't let the 0% down/seller carryback cloud your thinking. :)

Loading replies...